NO SQ790

I’m going to switch gears for a few minutes and talk about something that, at first glance, seems unrelated to education.


I am a pastor’s wife.  I am a cradle Methodist.  I am a Christian.


My family pausing for a photo before Christmas Eve service, 2014

And I stand AGAINST state question 790.


If you’re unfamiliar with SQ790, it is a question to repeal the “Blaine Amendment”.  If SQ790 passes, it would strike language from our constitution that expressly prohibits public money from being spent for religious purposes.


Proponents of SQ790 claim it is about restoring the Ten Commandments monument to the state capitol.  Currently, it resides at the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs, less than a mile from the Capitol lawn.


But I’m afraid it’s about so much more than that.  Changing our constitution to allow public tax dollars to be spent for religious purposes would bring about two consequences that disturb me.  First of all, it would make us vulnerable to costly litigation as we would be (once again) attempting to establish a law at the state level that is clearly unconstitutional at the national level.  freedom-of-religion-400wSecondly, this would open the door to vouchers, a long-time agenda of right-wing conservatives that allows education funding to be siphoned off to for-profit charter and private schools, further crippling already financially strapped public schools.


Proponents of SQ790 claim it is an attempt to protect religious liberty:

“Like the ‘Jim Crow’ laws that promoted segregation, the Blaine Amendment is a discriminatory provision in our Constitution that flies in the face of many of the Oklahoma values we cherish – love of neighbor, reverence for humanity and respect for the right to express religious freedom.”

~U.S. Senator James Lankford and Lt. Governor of Oklahoma Todd Lamb


Friends, if you are comparing the “persecution” of American Christians in the buckle of the Bible Belt to the persecution of African Americans in pre-1964 America (and even today), then you are clearly delusional.  If you assign equal weight to being unable to blast a prayer over the loudspeaker before Friday night football to black citizens being denied basic civil rights and murdered, then you need to seriously consider the true definition of “persecution”.


In what way does the absence of a ten commandments monument from the capitol keep you from practicing its tenets?


Furthermore, if you believe in God and think God is not present in public schools because we don’t force students to pray or attend chapel, then you need to take a good long look at what kids and teachers are doing in our schools.


Last year, the students at my school raised over $50,000 for a community family battling childhood cancer.


The second week of this school year, the students raised over $6000 for the Susan G. Komen foundation.  And perhaps more profound, they honored our principal with a standing ovation at that assembly, which happened to be on the day she completed her final radiation treatment for breast cancer.


Students in our leadership class spend time tutoring at our surrounding elementary schools.  Students in our Key Club and National Honor Society complete community service projects.  My students show great compassion for those who are different from them.  They celebrate each other.  They comfort each other.  They challenge each other.  They affirm each other.


If you are a Christian, then you already know Christ’s greatest commandment:  Love God and love your neighbor.  And by committing to the latter, we are fulfilling the former.  If we are practicing radical hospitality and love, God is here.  No “Bible-thumping” necessary.  In fact, you don’t have to open a Bible or even quote a scripture to fulfill God’s calling to love and serve your fellow man.  Do you not believe if you go out of your way to help the poor, feed the hungry, clothe the naked, and shelter the needy that God will show up and speak for God’s self?


God is very much alive in the spirit of service and love that exists in our schools today.  I firmly believe it.


Which makes me question the true motives of those who stand behind SQ790.  At best, it’s unnecessary.  We already have religious liberty.  And at worst, it’s a smokescreen for some other agenda, which I don’t trust.



7 thoughts on “NO SQ790

  1. Mindy, I taught at a Charter for 7 years. This does not give to Charter Schools. The State & Federal funds follow the student no mater where they go to school. Then they work to get Grants for Technology. Our Son, Brian, is the IT Director for Santa Fe South in South Okla. & Pathways Middle College. This system is an A+ school. Call Chris Brewster at SantaFeSouth, Superentendent.


    1. Hi, Patsy! Santa Fe South is a public charter. I was referencing private charters, which right now are being kept at bay in our state thanks in part to the diligence of the people of Oklahoma making it very clear that schools are accountable to the people. Public Charter Schools are accountable and fiscally transparent in many of the same ways that public schools are. PRIVATE charter schools are not.


  2. I have been skeptical of 790 since I first knew about it. Now, after reading your piece, I am even more opposed to it. I don’t see much merit in ANY of these state questions. They are. Seem flawed.


  3. The first point you made concerning “attempting to establish a law … that is clearly unconstitutional” is not supported by the facts. The Supreme Court in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris said that the school voucher program was not in violation of the Establishment Clause. Additionally, government support for religion is deemed constitutional as long as it occurs de facto and not de jure, or does not specify or encourage religious schools.

    Secondly, our education system is last in just about everything. We shouldn’t fear change. We need a new perspective and we need to experiment with new ways of educating our children. We can’t even look at this option because of wording that was born out of anti-catholic bigotry, and that same wording we have in our constitution was voted down from getting into our own U.S. Constitution, but somehow we got stuck with it.

    Does anyone really believe that the Establishment Clause is not enough to protect us from religious overreach? It seems that it has done a pretty good job so far. Besides, there are numerous other states such as Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New Jersey, to name a few that don’t have Blaine Amendment wording in their constitution and they don’t seem to be taken over by religious interests.

    SQ 790 should be a YES. This is not “A long time agenda of right wing conservatives.” at play here. It is common sense to get rid of bad wording in our constitution. It is time to get rid of something that doesn’t make sense.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s